Spent this morning in ASP.NET land working on a small modification in which I needed to data bind an array of hashtables to an <asp:repeater>. Looks like some other ASP.NETers had the same problem, but the ‘solutions’ they offered didn’t seem to solve the errors I was getting. First, in the code behind, I had something like this in the code behind:
public Repeater events = new Repeater();
private ArrayList aEvents = new ArrayList();
public void Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) {
Hashtable event1 = new Hashtable();
event1.Add("name", "name of event 1");
event1.Add("date", "5/31/2004");
Hashtable event2 = new Hashtable();
event2.Add("name", "name of event 2");
event2.Add("date", "06/20/2004");
aEvents.Add(event1);
aEvents.Add(event2);
events.DataSource = aEvents;
events.DataBind();
}
and then a standard repeater tag in my ASP.NET code:
<asp:repeater id="events" runat="server">
<ItemTemplate>
Name:<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem,"name") %>
Date:<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem,"date") %>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:repeater>
The first error I got was DataBinder.Eval: 'System.Collections.Hashtable' does not contain a property with the name name., which means that the DataBinder uses reflection to find a property called ‘name’ on the current object in the iteration. This is a problem because obviously a hashtable doesn’t have a public property for ‘name’, it only has an associate array of values. The workaround, although I don’t know why this works, is to wrap the keys in a brackets:
Name:<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem,"[name]") %>
Date:<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem,"[date]") %>
Using brackets lets you use an array of hashtables as a datasource. Since this works, it might be helpful to add it to the Data Binding Expression Syntax guide on MSDN.
What’s Going On Here?
My name is Aaron Johnson and I created this blog both for me (mostly) and sometimes you. I've been saving mydeliciouspinboard.in links here and blogging since 2002. During the week (and at night and some weekends and well.. most of the time), I work in engineering at Jive Software. When I'm not working, I'm hanging out with my amazing wife, ourdinosaurStar Wars loving son and four chickens in the burbs outside of Portland, Oregon.See Also
Monthly Archives
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (7)
- December 2012 (1)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (3)
- July 2012 (7)
- June 2012 (5)
- May 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (5)
- February 2012 (9)
- January 2012 (9)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (6)
- September 2011 (5)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (8)
- June 2011 (13)
- May 2011 (3)
- April 2011 (10)
- March 2011 (6)
- February 2011 (2)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (8)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (9)
- September 2010 (6)
- August 2010 (4)
- July 2010 (8)
- June 2010 (9)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (6)
- February 2010 (9)
- January 2010 (10)
- December 2009 (10)
- November 2009 (10)
- October 2009 (6)
- September 2009 (10)
- August 2009 (13)
- July 2009 (12)
- June 2009 (11)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (7)
- February 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (10)
- September 2008 (6)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (9)
- June 2008 (15)
- May 2008 (9)
- April 2008 (10)
- March 2008 (8)
- February 2008 (6)
- January 2008 (15)
- December 2007 (10)
- November 2007 (9)
- October 2007 (6)
- September 2007 (9)
- August 2007 (12)
- July 2007 (9)
- June 2007 (6)
- May 2007 (8)
- April 2007 (10)
- March 2007 (14)
- February 2007 (12)
- January 2007 (17)
- December 2006 (11)
- November 2006 (11)
- October 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (11)
- August 2006 (14)
- July 2006 (11)
- June 2006 (13)
- May 2006 (11)
- April 2006 (8)
- March 2006 (5)
- February 2006 (7)
- January 2006 (8)
- December 2005 (6)
- November 2005 (6)
- October 2005 (9)
- September 2005 (3)
- August 2005 (11)
- July 2005 (12)
- June 2005 (11)
- May 2005 (4)
- April 2005 (5)
- March 2005 (8)
- February 2005 (5)
- January 2005 (3)
- December 2004 (6)
- November 2004 (7)
- October 2004 (4)
- September 2004 (9)
- August 2004 (5)
- July 2004 (10)
- June 2004 (12)
- May 2004 (4)
- April 2004 (13)
- March 2004 (10)
- February 2004 (9)
- January 2004 (13)
- December 2003 (8)
- November 2003 (9)
- October 2003 (17)
- September 2003 (28)
- August 2003 (21)
- July 2003 (24)
- June 2003 (31)
- May 2003 (43)
- April 2003 (30)
- March 2003 (48)
- February 2003 (45)
- January 2003 (43)
- December 2002 (28)
- November 2002 (30)
- October 2002 (34)
- September 2002 (41)
- August 2002 (35)
- July 2002 (20)
- June 2002 (1)
Interesting finding Aaron. We’ve had similar things come up and now use the DataTable quite frequently, even for more lightweight pieces of data.
The databinding piece didn’t manifest itself quite in the way you are describing, it was more that the Hashtable did not store items in the same order that they were put in.
Now that I’ve used the datatable (and even have some wrappers for it) I’ve gotten used to having the ability to expand to more columns / sort on the fly and so on.
But it would be interesting to write a class with its own indexer to create a Hash structure that was more databinding friendly.
“‘System.Collections.Hashtable’ does not contain a property with the name name”
Well this is beacuse the hash table doesn’t have name as a property, but as a key. You need to use the indexer to access the value associated with that key. Here you have used the c# syntax (as I understand it). You can get the same results by using
or
It seems to me that using a hash table in this way is great from writing something quick and dirty, but what are the performance implications.? Also, I would look out for errors resulting from mistyped key names in your code.
Thanks Aaron! This is exactly what I was looking for.
thanks a lot for this post…
Thanks a ton, working perfectly…
Thanks a lot, dude. I was crazily looking for it for a while.
Incredible, it works!
thanks a lot!